lawyer for medical malpractice

Why You Should Hire a Lawyer for Medical Malpractice

Having a lawyer for medical malpractice can help you recover damages from your doctor or healthcare provider if you feel they have acted negligently. A lawyer will know the law and will work to help you get the best results possible.


Having a lawyer for medical malpractice for misdiagnosis can be a great way to protect your rights and get compensation. Misdiagnosis is a serious issue and can cause substantial harm to a patient. In addition, it can result in the delayed treatment of a serious medical condition or illness.

Misdiagnosis happens all too often in the health care system. In fact, a recent study found that misdiagnoses are the most common type of medical malpractice claims. Having a misdiagnosis can result in unnecessary treatments or surgery, increased risk for complications, and death.

To make a successful claim, the victim must prove that the medical professional acted in a negligent manner. This requires expert medical testimony. The victim’s legal team must also prove that another doctor would have diagnosed the health issue correctly.

Patients often assume that doctors will take the necessary measures to accurately diagnose their health conditions. Unfortunately, this can’t always be the case. A doctor may fail to listen to a patient or misread a test result. A doctor may also fail to take the time to properly examine a patient.

If you or a loved one have suffered from a misdiagnosis, you may be entitled to compensation for your medical expenses and pain and suffering. However, it is important to understand that proving medical malpractice for misdiagnosis is not easy.

It is important to hire an experienced medical malpractice attorney who has experience in misdiagnosis cases. The attorney will be able to help you gather all of your medical records and find out what went wrong.

If you have been misdiagnosed, it is important to seek medical attention right away. This will help prevent the illness from worsening and allow for proper treatment. If you are diagnosed with cancer, for example, you may receive unnecessary chemotherapy or radiation. Also, if you develop complications during pregnancy, your child may be at risk.

If you are in need of a lawyer for medical malpractice for misdiagnosis, you may contact the attorneys at Berger Lagnese & Paul, LLC. They are helping patients in Western Pennsylvania get compensation.

Informed consent

Getting informed consent is the best way to protect your rights as a patient. If a doctor or healthcare provider doesn’t properly inform you about the risks associated with a procedure, you may have grounds to file a lawsuit.

Medical malpractice can take many forms. A doctor may fail to give you adequate information about the risks associated with a procedure, resulting in injury or illness. The doctor may also make a mistake, such as using the wrong medicine or performing the wrong procedure. If you feel that you have been harmed by a medical provider, you should seek legal help from a medical malpractice lawyer.

Medical malpractice is a serious matter. Doctors and other healthcare providers risk civil or criminal litigation. While medical malpractice is often an expensive and long process, you can take your case to court and receive a fair settlement.

There are two standards courts use to determine whether or not a medical provider has provided you with sufficient information. One is the Reasonable Physician Standard, which is based on customary practice and requires that the doctor or practitioner provide information from the patient’s perspective. The other is the Subjective Standard, which focuses on the patient’s specific ailments.

There are also a variety of informed consent forms. These can be paper forms or digital ones. These forms are designed to help a medical provider explain the risks associated with a procedure or treatment to the patient. The form will also give the patient a chance to sign a refusal to undergo treatment.

There are two primary standards used to determine whether or not a medical provider should have provided you with information about a procedure. The first is the “prudent patient” standard, which focuses on what a reasonably informed patient would want to know. The second is the “reasonable practitioner” standard, which requires that the doctor or practitioner provide you with information about a procedure that a reasonable physician would consider important to your decision.

Although a lack of informed consent is an important issue, it isn’t always the biggest or most impressive. In fact, many attorneys believe that a lack of informed consent is a fallback position when a malpractice case is weak.

Punitive damages

Whether you are looking to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice or just have questions about a particular case, it is important to understand the different types of damages that you may be eligible for. In addition to compensatory damages, you may also be eligible for punitive damages.

Punitive damages are meant to punish the wrongdoer and discourage similar offenses in the future. They may also be awarded for cases of malice, wantonness, or oppression. Generally, though, punitive damages are only awarded for cases where the doctor committed an egregious act.

In addition to the “money prize”, compensatory damages are also available for medical malpractice injuries. These include economic damages, such as compensation for the injured person’s lost wages or medical expenses, as well as non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering, disfigurement, and loss of enjoyment of life.

While economic damages are important to help you recover from your injury, they can never make you whole. For example, if you suffer from a long-term disability as a result of medical malpractice, you may receive custodial care and other rehabilitation services. Similarly, non-economic damages account for your subjective losses, such as pain and suffering, disfigurement, loss of consortium, or other psychological damages.

Punitive damages, on the other hand, are intended to punish the at-fault doctor, but also to deter similar offenses in the future. In some cases, though, these damages are capped.

In the case of medical malpractice, the jury may have to determine whether the alleged offense was intentional. This can be a difficult task, because there are several factors that may need to be proven.

For instance, a doctor performing a surgical procedure while under the influence of alcohol may justify punitive damages. However, if the doctor was performing an unnecessary surgery, the doctor may not be liable for punitive damages.

On the other hand, if a doctor was negligent and committed malpractice in an attempt to save money, it is possible that the doctor could be liable for punitive damages. However, a doctor would not be able to argue that his malpractice was more reckless than the malpractice of another doctor in the same position.

Statute of limitations

Typically, a medical malpractice lawsuit must be filed within two years after the victim discovers the injury. However, there are several situations in which the statute of limitations can be extended.

In some jurisdictions, the statute of limitations starts running when the patient is diagnosed with an actionable condition, or when another licensed medical professional informs the claimant that malpractice has occurred. In other cases, the statute of limitations starts running when the claimant learns about a fraudulent act, such as the presence of foreign objects in the body.

Unlike other types of legal cases, the statute of limitations for medical malpractice does not apply to insane people. However, the law does provide a means for a person to recover damages for an injury caused by insanity. If an incompetent person is found to be the defendant in a medical malpractice lawsuit, the defendant may file a motion to dismiss the case. This can result in the dismissal of the case, with prejudice to the plaintiff.

New York law has a specific medical malpractice statute of limitations. This gives the patient 30 months from the date of malpractice. However, this does not apply to children under the age of 18. These children have a statute of repose of up to 10 years.

The statute of limitations for medical malpractice lawsuits in Pennsylvania is two years from the date the plaintiff discovers the injury. However, this time period can be extended if the plaintiff waits to contact a lawyer. This delays the statute of limitations and could result in lost evidence.

Similarly, the statute of repose in New Jersey is two years from the date of discovery. However, this time period can be extended by up to four years if the plaintiff was unconscious at the time of the injury.

Despite the different statutes of limitations, medical malpractice lawyers can usually file their cases after a patient has been injured, as long as the plaintiff has a substantiated claim. However, the statute of repose cannot extend the time for filing a wrongful death claim.

The medical malpractice statute of limitations can also be tollled, meaning the clock stops for a period of time. This can be because of the mental incompetence of the victim, or because the defendant is bankrupt.

Leave a Comment

error: Content is protected !!